Experimental Study on Portland Pozzolana Cement and Citric Acid Influence on Compressive Strength of Reinforced Concrete
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1234/sk04q736Keywords:
Portland Pozzolana Cement (PPC); Citric Acid; Reinforced Concrete; Compressive Strength; Mix DesignAbstract
In Ethiopia, the construction industry relies heavily on Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) for structural applications due to its rapid early strength development. However, the widespread use of OPC contributes to high production costs and increased carbon emissions associated with cement manufacturing. Therefore, there is a growing need to evaluate more sustainable alternatives, such as Portland Pozzolana Cement (PPC), potentially enhanced with organic admixtures, to meet structural performance requirements while reducing environmental impact. This study investigates the combined effect of partially replacing Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) with Portland Pozzolana Cement (PPC) and adding citric acid as a chemical admixture on the compressive strength, setting time, and workability of reinforced concrete. Concrete samples of C-30 grade were prepared using OPC, PPC, and PPC modified with varying dosages of citric acid (0.1–0.4% by weight of Portland Pozzolana Cement). Experimental results indicated that citric acid acts as a retarder and water-reducing agent, improving the workability and extending the setting time without significantly compromising strength. The optimal dosage was determined to be 0.3% citric acid, which resulted in a 55% increase in slump, a delay in setting time of 1 hr 50 min (initial) and 3 hr 10 min (final), a comparable 28-day compressive strength to OPC mixes and a cost reduction of 258.86 Ethiopian birr per cubic meter of concrete. The combined use of PPC and citric acid demonstrated improved performance and cost effectiveness compared to OPC-based mixes, promoting sustainable concrete production suitable for the Ethiopian construction industry.
References
1. ACI Committee 233. (2003). Slag cement in concrete and mortar (ACI 233R-03). American Concrete Institute.
2. ACI Committee 301. (2016). Specifications for structural concrete (ACI 301-16). American Concrete Institute.
3. Addisu, F. (2014). Study on the uses of Derba Ordinary Portland and Portland Pozzolana cements for structural concrete production. Addis Ababa University.
4. Albadrani, M. A. (2025). Long-term performance of Portland pozzolana cement blended with rice husk ash in sustainable concrete production. Construction and Building Materials, 412, 134512. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/cbm.2025.134512
5. ASTM C33/C33M-18. (2018). Standard specification for concrete aggregates. ASTM International.
6. ASTM C39/C39M-20. (2020). Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM International.
7. ASTM C143/C143M-15a. (2015). Standard test method for slump of hydraulic-cement concrete. ASTM International.
8. ASTM C1602/C1602M-18. (2018). Standard specification for mixing water used in the production of hydraulic cement concrete. ASTM International.
9. ASTM C191-19. (2019). Standard test methods for time of setting of hydraulic cement by Vicat needle. ASTM International.
10. ASTM C494/C494M-19. (2019). Standard specification for chemical admixtures for concrete. ASTM International.
11. Bijen, J. (1996). Benefits of slag and fly ash. Construction and Building Materials, 10(5), 309–314.
12. Ciacchella, M., Rossi, F., Bianchi, A., & Conti, L. (2025). Citric acid as a salt crystallization inhibitor in cement-based materials under wet–dry cycling. Materials and Structures, 58(3), 102.
13. Department of Environment (DOE). (1988). Design of normal concrete mixes (2nd ed.). Building Research Establishment.
14. Dhanya Sathyan, D. (2018). Influence of chemical admixtures on the strength and durability of pozzolanic concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 173, 631–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.045
15. Hewlett, P. C., & Liska, M. (2019). Lea’s chemistry of cement and concrete (5th ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann.
16. Neville, A. M. (2011). Properties of concrete (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
17. Nigus, A. (2005). A comparative study of Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) and Portland Pozzolana Cement (PPC) with emphasis on their strength and durability. Addis Ababa University Institutional Repository.
18. Purnomo, E., Dewi, R. S., & Setiawan, D. (2019a). Influence of citric acid on the setting time and strength of Portland cement. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 669, 012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/669/1/012025
19. Purnomo, S., Sumarni, I. N., & Saputro, I. (2019b). Effect of citric acid concentration on compressive strength of concrete bricks. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering.
20. Qin, Y., Zhang, H., Liu, X., & Wang, J. (2024). Effect of citric acid–modified chitosan on hydration kinetics, strength development, and shrinkage behavior of cementitious systems. Cement and Concrete Composites, 146, 105321. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/ccc.2024.105321
21. Rajendra, K. (2013a). Performance of fly ash in Portland Pozzolana Cement. International Journal of Civil Engineering Research, 4(2), 143–152.
22. Rajendra, P. (2013b). Study on the performance of Portland pozzolana cement in structural applications. International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering, 4(2), 85–92.
23. Tinnea, J., & Young, J. F. (1977a). Effect of citric acid on the hydration of Portland cement. Cement and Concrete Research, 7(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(77)90067-9
24. Tinnea, J., & Young, J. F. (1977b). Retardation of cement hydration by organic admixtures. Cement and Concrete Research, 7(3), 373–383.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Abebech Haileselassie Manaye, Sintayehu Nibret Tiruneh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://docs.pkp.sfu.ca/journal-policies-workflows/en/copyright-licensing
